The VikiD Truth

Knowledge base / Philosophy / Philosophers

Philosophy | Economics | Politics | Ethics | Aesthetics

Ludwig Wittgenstein

witt

  Wittgensteins's Tractus may be called a synthesis of the theory
  of truth-functions and the idea that language is a picture of
  reality.

  Out of this synthesis arises a third main ingredient of the book,
  its doctrine of that which cannot be said, only shown.

  Ludwig Wittgenstein A Memoir by Norman Malcom

Date: 30/11/2016

He had a habit of writing thing down in note books. Like him, I too have a scattering of note books but unlike him, mine are not so organised or dated. There is a beauty to note taking. Something in it that sharpens the mind. It makes you think with greater precision and clarity and acts as a reference at future dates often bringing back more than what is immediately written down.

Wittgenstein was a friend and contemporary to:

He was also influenced by:

After the death of his father in 1912, Wittgenstein inherited a fortune. He promptly gave it all away, choosing a life of extreme simplicity and frugality. Despite choosing this life, I find his life most fascinating. Wittgenstein fought in The Great War, he was a gifted musician, conductor, an artist, architect, sculptor and more. He was member of the Royal Society and the chair of Philosophy in Cambridge.

The plain idea

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) is the rare philosopher who produced two revolutionary philosophies, and the second one demolished the first.

Why it matters

An everyday analogy: what is a game?

Wittgenstein’s famous challenge: define “game”. Board games, ball games, card games, solitaire, ring-a-ring o’ roses. Not all have winners; not all have rules written down; not all involve skill or luck or more than one person. There is no single feature they all share. Instead they overlap like the members of a family: one has the nose, another the eyes, a third the walk. He called this family resemblance, and it means many of our most useful words have no sharp definition, and don’t need one.

A worked example: “Five red apples”

Wittgenstein opens the Investigations with a shopkeeper who is handed a slip reading “five red apples”. He opens the drawer marked “apples”, looks up “red” on a colour chart, and counts “one, two, three, four, five”, taking an apple each time.

Now ask: what does “five” mean? There is no object called five in the drawer. The meaning of “five” is shown entirely in what the shopkeeper does with it, the counting. Compare that with the Tractatus picture, where each word names an object. One small shop scene and the picture theory starts to crack.

The beetle in the box

Another thought experiment, aimed at the idea of a purely private inner language: suppose everyone has a box with something they call a “beetle” inside, and nobody can look into anyone else’s box. Then the word “beetle” can’t get its meaning from the thing in the box. The thing could be different for everyone, or nothing at all, and the word would still work the same way in conversation. His point was not that sensations don’t exist, but that the meaning of words like “pain” is anchored in shared public life, not in private inspection.

Common misconceptions

How it connects

The truth revealed: often the problem isn’t the world, it’s the way we’re talking about it.

Last edited · 19 revisions

Tags: #Philosophy